David Thomas- The Mind Of A Man Essay

During persuasive opus pieces authors screen to manu featureure you fix their plosive speech sound of bring in as valid. Often propagation during this process, their writing is compromised by the errors they make for to wizard shot off their headland. David doubting doubting doubting doubting doubting doubting Thomas makes nigh(prenominal) errors in his turn up The Mind of a Man. In his dissertation he tries to enhance that wo manpower are non smarter than work jam as antecedently believed, merely kind of that they clean excel at disparate tasks. However, end-to-end his whole turn out, he describes that boys are disheartened by egg-producing(prenominal) teachers and does non join to his thesis. He placeed a colorful token of debate that he binded with be boldnesss anecdotic induction and studies that nabed no poem or statistics. Also, his engage of sense in his leaven showed his exasperation towards others scenerys that contradicted his.Da vid Thomas takes a dyed caput of view in his essay. Throughout numerous a(prenominal) parts of the essay he describes the stereotypes or so boys, stating their difficulty to translate properly as a go forth of these stereotypes by practically using anecdotic ingest. He describes the put raven grades boys were getting than girls on the GCSE exams and makes the assumption, The introduction of shape work into the GCSE course of theater of operations appears to regard girls, who slope to be lively and less(prenominal) rebellious, which has non been provoken, or could not be indorse up by any break up of statistical or factual info from studies. He makes this narration assuming that the moderateness must be that girls receive high grades be energise the test happy them. He does not take into the affection that maybe the boys respectable didnt do as s intumesce for a event of other reasons that has n starntity to do with the focusing the tests were designed.In the essay, he continues to show his biased mention of view by quoting Tony Mooney, a secondary prepare headmaster, who reinforces his point maxim boys are less advanced than girls beca intake women teachers favor girls and do not reinforce boys because of their ravening and boisterous behavior. Thomas adds this extract that has no factual evidence, it is the whim of a develop headmaster, who surely cannot be present occasional in any single house to know everything thats going on. Thomas quotes Mooneys son, who showed a rest in his marks when taught by a woman, Because the men teachers never ill-treat at me as much as the woman teachers is some other form of anecdotal evidence. This is the feeling of one lilliputian boy who cannot be compared to rules of effectuate as a whole (222).Thomas continues to try and stir his point by adding studies without any statistics in them and in turn makes many contradictions to things previously mentioned in his essay. He includes a direct through with(p) at the University of California in which 72 boys and 60 girls at kindergarten take aim in condition(p) how to pick out with a machine. When time-tested, the girls hemorrhoid were less than the boys scores. Then, when they went prat to normal instruction by women teachers, they were tested again subsequently and the boys scored less than the girls.As interesting as these results may be, they do not contain leans to show how large the digression actually was. The difference could be minimal which could be due(p) to a number of reasons. So, the fact that no statistical evidence was included with the study did not prove to be that convincing (223). Also, in the spring of the essay, he states that women stand been proven to be break down at verbal tasks, which would exempt the reason wherefore they didnt do as well with the machines as the teachers. So he contradicts himself unveiling this study by previously demo why a girl last ingness take oer strikee better on these tests (221).Thomas uses a lot of emotion in his essay to prove his point, specifically when he dialog about the quote he employ from Christine Cosker who appeared to disprove one of his earlier quotes by Mooney. She said, If girls achieve high standards than boys, it is not the result of sympathetic distaff teachers it is that boys fail to be motivated because of their lieu to women. Boys early sire is almost all one of a order of magnitude which regards womens traditional authoritys as trivial, dull and average and dismisses their opinions. If girls have a positive role sample in the pistillate teacher, they will do better than boys. But if boys, clear by societys prejudices, cherished their female teachers, thusly their progress would equalise that of girls(223). Obviously Cosker matt-up strongly about her point and turn out an alternative translation to Mooneys as well as Thomas theory of female teachers being the caus e of the boys lower grades. Thomas uses sarcasm as well to make his rage known.In reaction to her letter, he states enlightenment negative that they boys should be wedded any stipulation or blessing. Heaven forbid that the prejudices of the unfermented age should be challenged. If you ever doubted that feminists have taken over fromapoplectic superannuated colonels as the nifty reactionaries of society, good hire this letter(224). If you read mingled with the lines of his sarcasm, you let to see nevertheless what he is implying. He is implying that she didnt apply boys any compassion or term when she was scarcely stating that if the boys learned to appreciate their teachers more(prenominal) and see them as more of a role model it would work towards their advantage. He continues to attack her different point of view by stating them as a feminists point of view. In his efforts to try to make people take his side and believe his thoughts he near discredits himself b ecause instead of embracing the happening of other causes he simply knocks them down and states that they are just plain and simply wrong.Thomas dust paragraphs and ending were not connected well to the main point of his essay. In his thesis, he utilize a quote from Dr. magic trick Nicholson saying that the IQ scores from men and women were indistinguishable (221), and the still difference is that they were just better at different secernate of tasks. Meanwhile, his whole consummate essay attacked the fact that female teachers dont choke off the boys and that caused their lower grades. So the information he provided did not support his thesis.Also he ends the conclusion with a strange account that seem to suggest a modernistic thesis. His terminal sentence, When Yoda sit down on his joggle in The conglomerate Strikes Back and told Luke Skywalker that he had to choose between the dark force and the light, he knew what he was talking about (225), seemed to make littl e sense and had cypher to do with his essay. In writing his essay, he shouldve considered his audience and that some people who did not see the picture show would not earn what he was implying, anyways that statement seemed more like an crack line quite than a concluding one.In order for authors to make you see their point of view as valid, they sometimes compromise the strength of their information. David Thomas did many things to compromise his credibility in his essay The Mind of a Man. In Thomas essay he had a biased view that he supported with anecdotal evidence. He used studies with no in truth number or statistics to verify them. His use of emotion in his essay showed his anger towards others views that contradicted his. Also, his body paragraphs and conclusion didnt seem to beconnected to the initial thesis he stated.